After the Kuomintang successfully dismissed the legislator Chen Baiwei, Zhu Lilun, who had just taken office as the party chairman, immediately waved his sword and pointed to the four major referendums on December 18, which directly set the tone for a political confrontation with a vote of no confidence in the ruling party, calling on the people to vote for the four votes; The DPP's counterattack is a ferocious political party fight that disregards the international political and economic situation and will set the country back, calling on the public to vote for four disagreements. When the two major parties began to use political language to recall their basic supporters, the four major referendum cases have officially become a tool for political party confrontation, and there is no room for rational discussion of the impact of the case and how to deal with it.
This is the first referendum after the referendum was decoupled from the general election. Considering the low turnout rate, even if the two major parties can successfully recall their respective fundamentals, the key to deciding whether the referendum has passed or failed may still lie in the fact that there is no established position yet. of voting rights. Therefore, in the gap between the political parties, how to win the support of those who have no established positions? Perhaps number list if the four major referendums are passed, will they have a direct impact on Taiwan, and even on those who have no established positions? What are the government's response and mitigation measures? That may be the key factor in their final yes or no vote. What is the impact of each referendum? What is the degree and scope of the impact? Just the overall broad impact? Or will there be specific industry, ethnic or regional stakeholders who will be directly impacted? What is the government's response to the overall impact.
What are the relief and compensation measures for the directly affected stakeholders? These issues should be publicly disclosed by the government's assessment report, so that citizens can have a basis for reference when voting. But usually after the referendum, the government has the basis for a detailed assessment, and it takes some time. Article 10, item 8 of my country's "Reflection Law" stipulates that after the referendum proposal is in compliance (that is, the first stage is established, joint signatures can be started), the government agency must submit an opinion within 45 days after receiving the letter from the election meeting. The content of the book shall also state the legal effects of passing or not passing. But how can the government agency propose a detailed impact assessment within 45 days to let the public know the pros and cons? Without a detailed assessment report as a basis, even if the legal effects have been explained and failed, it is still difficult for the public to judge whether they should vote yes or no from the level of actual impact.